'Alcohol is more harmful than heroin.' Really? Sample before you speak

Author: Jack Miles

Professor David Nutt was back in the headlines this week. In October 2009 he was sacked from his position as UK government's chief drug adviser after suggesting that LSD and heroin were less harmful than alcohol and tobacco, and that taking ecstasy was less dangerous than riding a horse. Now, almost exactly a year on, he has done it again.  This time his claim is that alcohol is more harmful than heroinProfessor Nutt’s statement is statistically fuelled. However, it is also statistically flawed.

Just a placeholder image

More dangerous than recreational drugs? The Big Raspers At Aintree, 1927 painting of an incident at the Grand National. Copyright of the Lordprice Collection, with permission.

In their study, Professor Nutt and his colleagues rated the harmfulness of 20 drugs on 16 measures using a scale of 0 – 100, with 0 meaning not harmful and 100 meaning the most harmful. This was a ratio scale where the distance between each point on the scale is equal.

For example, a drug scoring 50 on such a scale is twice as harmful as a drug scoring 25. Using this scale, all the drugs included within the study were rated on all 16 measures in relation to both harm to the user and harm to others. Recognising that some measures are more important than others, Nutt weighted the scores for the measures to reflect the importance of each measure.

Based on the above, Nutt’s statement, which initially sounded farfetched, appears to have a strong statistical grounding. However, once we evaluate Nutt’s sampling strategy, flaws in his methodology are highlighted. The drugs in Nutt’s study were scored by a small group of experts. Such a sampling frame has several disadvantages:

• The experts scoring the drugs, whilst having extensive academic backgrounds, presumably are not drugs users themselves. This means that the measurement of harm to users is really the expert’s perceptions of the harm drugs cause users


• Again, when measuring harm to others, the experts are only offering their perceptions of how drugs harm others as they are unlikely to have direct, mass scale experience of how using each of the 20 drugs can affect others


• The size of the sample of experts is not large enough to make statistical inferences. In commercial    research, the findings from any sample lower than n=50 are seen as directional and not significant

Despite employing robust scaling and weighting methods, Nutt’s work appears to be let down by a poorly targeted sampling strategy and a small base size, meaning that the methodology behind the highly impactful headline “Alcohol is More Harmful Than Heroin” is “Nutt quite” as robust as it initially appears. Resultantly, the findings of this study are based more on academic perception than social reality and the findings, at best, are directional.

Bookmark and Share

Comment on this article

Submit your comment
  1. Image of unique ID

Comments

John

Statistics are unreliable in the first place because of the fact it is illegal.  Medically the health harms, overdoses, social deviancy all can be explained as being a result of prohibition.  Just like when alcohol was prohibited people went blind and got sick from bad moonshine.  These are the facts:  Pharmaceutical grade Heroin is nothing but a pro-drug for morphine.  Pure heroin is about twice as addictive as alcohol.  And any symptoms of physical dependency typically takes several weeks of daily use.  However quite unlike alcohol, it doesn't damage the organs or brain.  Its only long term effect on the body is constipation.  It's acute toxicity (ratio of active dose to lethal dose) is also far less than alcohol.  It doesn't lower inhibitions or give a false sense of power the way alcohol dose.  Motor impairment is also not really a problem with heroin and some sedative effects generally occur only after large doses for 15 or so minutes.  Heroin withdrawal is rarely ever fatal, unlike alcohol withdrawal which can be. 

reply to this comment

Gracye

Thanks guys, I just about lost it lokoing for this.

reply to this comment

Harry

Seems like another question mark arises against the Delphi Method

reply to this comment

Sue in Reading, PA

Sounds like a Nut to me!

reply to this comment

Skip to Main Site Navigation / Login

Site Search Form

Site Search